Skip to content

Faith Comes by Hearing: A Response to Inclusivism

March 21, 2011

Collin Hansen at The Gospel Coalition posts on relating to people from other religions, and he points to Faith Comes By Hearing: A Response to Inclusivism by Christopher W. Morgan and Robert A. Peterson.  Hansen interviews Morgan on this subject, and Morgan says:

Exclusivism (sometimes called “particularism”) is the position that Jesus is the unique Savior, the only hope of reconciliation with God. Inclusivism posits a variety of possible ways of salvation, including Jesus as well as various religions. Pluralism concludes that all paths equally and validly lead people to wholeness/salvation, however one may understand it.

Historically, the church has been committed to exclusivism and has regarded both inclusivism and pluralism (as the terms relate to world religions) as very serious errors. But the church’s exclusivist theology of other religions is more multifaceted than many critics acknowledge. It would typically include the following:

(1) Other religions should not be caricatured. This is irresponsible, unloving, and ultimately damages our mission. Jesus’ commands to love others and his Golden Rule apply here, too. The church must convey other religions in a way that is evenhanded and accurate.

(2) Non-Christian religions are not completely false. A Christian understanding of the goodness of creation, the reality of general revelation, the permanence of the image of God in all humans, and the gift of God’s common grace leads us to expect that non-Christian religions contain some elements of truth and add some value to their cultures.

(3) Since the Fall human beings are radically sinful and distort everything they touch—including religion, even especially religion. Harold Netland proposes that just as human cultures are the product both of God’s creative activity and of human sin and therefore reflect a mixture of good and evil, so too the religious dimensions of human experience contain elements of both good and evil, truth and falsity. Human beings are not as sinful as they could be, but their sin is pervasive—it affects their minds, wills, emotions, longings, and therefore, their religion. Apart from reception of special revelation and submission to God, people will not think correctly about the true God, will not desire to worship him properly, and they will not love him. Instead, they will prefer themselves, their own agenda, and their own idolatrous religion (Rom 1:18-32). As John Stott observed, “Even his religiosity is a subtle escape from the God he is afraid of and ashamed to meet.”

(4) Some—although not all—of the theology and activity of non-Christian religions is rooted in the demonic and satanic (1 Cor 10:20; 2 Cor 4:4; Eph 4:17-18).

(5) The Christian God is unique, incomparable, and allows no rivals (e.g., Ex 20; Is 45). Eckhard Schnabel correctly stresses:

Both Israel and the early Christians were convinced that God had indeed provided a path to salvation, a path that is inextricably linked with the divine revelation of the perspectives, the principles, and the promises of faith and worship that please God. Both Israel and the early Christians were convinced that such a divine revelation had taken place in Israel. Jews were convinced that such a saving revelation had occurred in the history of the descendants of Abraham. And the early Christians were convinced that the climax of God’s saving revelation had taken place in the person and history of Jesus of Nazareth, the messianic Son of Man. Both Israel and the early Christians held that other systems of faith and worship were human—grounded in human concerns, framed by human beings, and controlled by human ideas about deities and sacrifices.

(6)  Salvation can be found only in Christ, the unique Savior. Therefore, other religions cannot save. Jesus himself asserted, “I am the way, truth, and life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). Peter declared that there are no other avenues of salvation (Acts 4:12). Paul’s message was consistent: Faith in Christ is necessary for salvation (Rom 10:9-17).

(7) Dialogue with members of other religion is valid and can serve to build relationships, express friendship, display respect, clarify the distinct theological positions, grow in mutual understanding, uncover weaknesses in our own faith and practice, advance the sanctity of human life, and promote civil peace.

(8)  Since faith in Christ is necessary for salvation, Christians desire, pray for, and work toward the salvation of all people, including members of other religions. Such mission and witness is not “arrogant” or “hate speech” as some in our pluralistic society claim, but loving and necessary. Schnabel states it well:

While the apostle Paul would not have wanted to justify or promote injustice and conflict, and while he certainly did not believe that he had “exhausted” the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God (Rom 11:33-35; cf. Phil 3:12), he was convinced of the truth of his theological affirmations, of the deception of secular religions, of the fact that God now provides salvation only on account of the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, and of the reality of God’s judgment. Paul was a missionary, not a religionist involved in a dialogue that proceeds from the assumption that God is present in all religions, that salvation is possible through all faiths and ideologies, and that God’s Spirit is at work in all religions, faiths, and ideologies. Paul did not suggest that Athenians who worship Zeus, or Isis, or the emperor, “walk together” with him “towards the fullness of truth.” Paul was convinced that pagan religiosity and spirituality constitute a deliberate rebellion against God. Paul did not hesitate to call idol worshipers fools whose religious activities demonstrate futile ignorance that is devoid of salvation. Paul never abandons his conviction that the sole criterion for valid religious knowledge and for relevant spiritual truth is God’s revelation in Jesus, the crucified and risen Messiah (Rom 3:21-26; 1 Cor 1:23-24; 2:2).

In his answer, Morgan references two other books: 1) Encountering Religious Pluralism by Harold Netland, and 2) Christian Mission in the Modern World by John Stott.

Advertisements

From → Theology

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: